Re: IMPORTANT need quick feedback on radical change
Christian Tismer <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:51:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Christensen wrote: >>>>>>"Christian" == Christian Tismer <[email protected]> writes: > > Christian> According to some older statements from Guido, list > Christian> notation suggests a collection of similar values. while > Christian> tuples are typically used as heterogenous sets of > Christian> values. Even immutability is not essential, but appearance > Christian> is. > > This distinction between lists at tuples exists merely by convention, > and even then it's not consistently used. While you do have a point, I > don't think it's quite important enough to keep around an extra type, > let alone extra syntax. What's more, the tuple syntax is not always > the most obvious to newbies, but that's a fairly minor point. Ok, but then I think Prothon will never be the Python 3000 which it tries to be. What is the cost of a type? That's no real argument here. I'd take a more conservative approach and only change things which make sense to change. Convincing long-time Python users to learn many differences for almost no effect but like "hey I saved a type" will be a hurdle. ciao - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/