Re: IMPORTANT need quick feedback on radical change

Christian Tismer <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:51:49 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Martin Christensen wrote:

>>>>>>"Christian" == Christian Tismer <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> Christian> According to some older statements from Guido, list
> Christian> notation suggests a collection of similar values.  while
> Christian> tuples are typically used as heterogenous sets of
> Christian> values. Even immutability is not essential, but appearance
> Christian> is.
> 
> This distinction between lists at tuples exists merely by convention,
> and even then it's not consistently used. While you do have a point, I
> don't think it's quite important enough to keep around an extra type,
> let alone extra syntax. What's more, the tuple syntax is not always
> the most obvious to newbies, but that's a fairly minor point.

Ok, but then I think Prothon will never be the Python 3000
which it tries to be.

What is the cost of a type? That's no real argument here.
I'd take a more conservative approach and only change things
which make sense to change.
Convincing long-time Python users to learn many differences
for almost no effect but like "hey I saved a type"
will be a hurdle.

ciao - chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:[email protected]>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/