Re[4]: backslashes and r-strings r"abc"
Lenard Lindstrom <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:54:22 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Mahogany-0.66.0-4294580231-20040727-095550.00@pop3.norton.antivirus> |
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:33:09 -0700 Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > Lenard Lindstrom wrote: > > > > One thing that bothers me about Python's r-strings is that they are > > > supposed to pass backslashes but they throw an exception if > > you have a > > > backslash as the last character. This makes them useless > > in one place > > > I've always wanted to use them: > > > > > > r"c:\windows directory\" # throws Python exception > > > > > > So maybe Prothon could at least fix that problem. Does > > anyone see any > > > reason to preserve Python's restriction on not having a > > backslash as > > > the last character of a r-string? > > > > > Go ahead. Backslash for line continuation in a raw string is > > broken for both Prothon and Python anyways: > > > > Python 2.4a1 (#54, Jul 8 2004, 11:30:13) [MSC v.1310 32 bit > > (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or > > "license" for more information. > > >>> r"abc\ > > ... def" > > 'abc\\\ndef' > > How can a backslash do continuation if backslashes are disabled in a > r-string? > > > Prothon 0.1 Interactive Console, Build 742, Jul 15 2004 > > (Ctrl-D to exit) > > O>> r"abc\ > > ... def" > > Lexical error: unterminated quote string > > > > By the way, what happened to string literal concatenation? I > > thought it was on the todo list. > > It IS on the to-do list. :-) I've been busy writing my talk and rewriting > the object code preparing for the new garbage collector. > Okay. No rush. > > Prothon 0.1 Interactive Console, Build 742, Jul 15 2004 > > (Ctrl-D to exit) > > O>> print("abc" "def") > > > > Parse Error: expecting `')'' or `','' > > --- col: 18 > > > > Uncaught exception: > > Parse Error. > > > > String literal concatenation replaced almost all uses of line > > continuation within strings unnecessary. The only use I have > > found for line continuation is at the start of triple-quoted strings. > > > > print("""\ > > The following is arranged > > as to how it will appear. > > """) > > The you shouldn't care if they don't work in r-strings. > No.