Meta-level questions
Paul Prescod <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Aug 2004 10:12:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A question as big as this one can never be resolved by consensus unless
there is a clear sense of common goals. As an extreme example, someone
whose primary goal is to experiment with virtual machine technologies
will find it a waste of time to just reuse the .NET VM. On the other
hand, someone whose primary goal is to get many users for a cool
language quickly will find it easier to do so by enlisting the vast
hordes of .NET programmers yearning (whether they know it or not) for a
production quality dynamic language.
Prothon 1.0 cannot be all things to all people. I propose that Mark list
5 *ranked* goals for Prothon 1.0 and another 5 ranked goals for
long-term Prothon. Then we'll have a framework for discussion. Otherwise
we will all just argue in favour of our favorite application
("device-embedded Prothon" versus "Prothon for Windows programming") and
of course we'll never agree.
Paul Prescod