Re: Re: Python parser

Laurent Dube wrote:

> Mark Hahn wrote:
> 
>> The best I could do would be to have the CPython interpreter running
>> embedded inside my Prothon interpreter and bridging calls from Prothon 
>> over
>> to Python.  
> 
> 
> Why the need for CPython? How far could you get considering python code
> as badly-formulated prothon? I'm not thinking pre-translation here, but
> direct parsing.

The most intersting libraries are not written in Python. PyGTK, PyExpat, 
   the SSL binding, WxPython, Tkinter, Numeric, etc.

  Paul Prescod