Re: decorators again (Guido's @ solution)

Mark Hahn wrote:

> What does everyone think of Guido's at-sign solution for Python's
> decorators?  He is apparently forcing it on Python.  It reminds me of my
> early Prothon symbols.
> 
> http://python.org/peps/pep-0318.html
> 
> Should I copy this for Prothon decorators?

Uncharacteristically, I don't have a strong opinion. I still prefer 
Python's declarative decorators to Prothon's procedural initialization 
blocks -- in terms of syntax. But I don't care much one way or the other 
about the "@" sign. I have a slight preference for the newer "|" symbol 
that was suggested over the last couple of days.

  Paul Prescod