Re: A very small p-value

Bert Gunter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.r.general
Message-ID <CAGxFJbRgfNcsmYORnLrbXNQm6dwwo4JMME1b9Por0CXakVzqBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In my own experience, teeny tiny p-values were either markers of already
well known stuff or of errors somewhere -- often my own typos, etc. That
is, they never indicated anything of real scientific interest. Of course,
YMMV.

😟

-- Bert

On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 3:34 PM Ben Bolker <[email protected]> wrote:

>    One possible source of confusion is that the `print.Coefmat` function
> uses .Machine$double.eps as its threshold for printing "< [minimum
> value]" rather than the precise computed p-value (presumably on the
> grounds that a number smaller than this is likely to be unrealistic as
> an accurate statement of the unlikeliness of an outcome in the real world).
>
> On 10/26/25 10:41, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> > No, 0 and 5-19 are not "equalled".  THey are quite distinct.
> > As for pt() returning something smaller than double.eps, why wouldn't it?
> > If I calculate 10^-30, I get 1e-30, which is much smaller than
> double.eps,
> > but is still correct.  It would be a serious error to return 0 for
> 10^-30.
> > Welcome to the wonderful world of floating-point arithmetic.
> > This really has nothing to do with R.
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 at 09:38, Christophe Dutang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for your answers.
> >>
> >> I was not aware of the R function expm1().
> >>
> >> I’m completely aware that 1 == 1 - 5e-19. But I was wondering why pt()
> returns something smaller than double.eps.
> >>
> >> For students who will use this exercise, it is disturbing to find 0 or
> 5e-19 : yet it will be a good exercise to find that these quantities are
> equalled.
> >>
> >> Regards, Christophe
> >>
> >>> Le 25 oct. 2025 à 12:14, Ivan Krylov <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> В Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:45:42 +0200
> >>> Christophe Dutang <[email protected]> пишет:
> >>>
> >>>> Indeed, the p-value is lower than the epsilon machine
> >>>>
> >>>>> pt(t_score, df = n-2, lower=FALSE) < .Machine$double.eps
> >>>> [1] TRUE
> >>>
> >>> Which means that for lower=TRUE, there will not be enough digits in R's
> >>> numeric() type to represent the 5*10^-19 subtracted from 1 and
> >>> approximately 16 zeroes.
> >>>
> >>> Instead, you can verify your answer by asking for the logarithm of the
> >>> number that is too close to 1, thus retaining more significant digits:
> >>>
> >>> print(
> >>> -expm1(pt(t_score, df = n-2, lower=TRUE, log.p = TRUE)),
> >>> digits=16
> >>> )
> >>> # [1] 2.539746620181249e-19
> >>> print(pt(t_score, df = n-2, lower=FALSE), digits=16)
> >>> # [1] 2.539746620181248e-19
> >>>
> >>> expm1(.) computes exp(.)-1 while retaining precision for numbers that
> >>> are too close to 0, for which exp() would otherwise return 1.
> >>>
> >>> See the links in
> >>>
> https://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why-doesn_0027t-R-think-these-numbers-are-equal_003f
> >>> for a more detailed explanation.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Ivan
> >>> (flipping the "days since referring to R FAQ 7.31" sign back to 0)
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________
> >> [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> >> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> --
> Dr. Benjamin Bolker
> Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University
> Associate chair (graduate), Mathematics & Statistics
> Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering
> * E-mail is sent at my convenience; I don't expect replies outside of
> working hours.
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.