Issue #16039 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).
JustJosh (Joshua Stowers) wrote:
> @sawa - I 100% agree with what you are saying. I did a poor job expressing my concerns.
>
> I am nervous that singling out array arguments in the abbreviated form could result in confusion and misuse. This is not a problem for `Range#cover?`, because a range cannot be composed of other ranges.
>
> Since `Set#superset?` does not have an abbreviated form, there is less opportunity for misuse.
I understand your point. If that is a concern, then we can simply not allow the abbreviated form for `Array#cover?`; raise an argument error when the argument is not an array, which is probably what the original proposal in this thread assumed. This somewhat weakly brakes the analogy from `Range#cover?`, but it should not a big deal.
(And still, there is an alternative view to not worry about that too much, and just allow the abbreviated form.)
----------------------------------------
Feature #16039: Array#contains? to check if one array contains another array
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16039#change-83238
* Author: cha1tanya (Prathamesh Sonpatki)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I woud like to propose `Array#contains?` which will check if the one array is part of another array.
Implementation can be as follows:
```
def contains?(other)
(other - self).empty?
end
```
Some test cases:
```
[1, 2, 3].contains?([2, 3]) => true
[1, 2, 3].contains?([]) => true
[1, 2, 3].contains?([1, 2, 3, 4]) => false
[].contains?([]) => true
[].contains?([1, 2, 3, 4]) => false
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.