[ruby-core:96445] [Ruby master Bug#16437] Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1)

Issue #16437 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


Thank you, yes, "exapmle" in test/openssl/test_x509name.rb is intentional to test malformed RDN by a typo.
And for others:
* Fixed the typos in debug_counter.h and error.c.
* I see the word "unuseful" in some online dictionaries.
* `spawnve` is an old function name provided by Microsoft and some platforms.
* The URLs in "enc/x_emoji.h" come from NTT-DoCoMo
  Although the pages for developers in English seem no longer provided, its Japanese version has the same word.
  Maybe %-escape can avoid the false positive.
* "lib/rubygems.rb" comes from the external library rubygems.
* `PRES` stands for "private resident", an abbreviation in FreeBSD.


----------------------------------------
Bug #16437: Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16437#change-83369

* Author: jschleus (Jens Schleusener)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.6.5 (2.7.0-rc1)
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The FOSS server fossies.org offers a new feature "Source code misspelling reports":

 https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell

Although such reports are normally only generated on request, as Fossies administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) an analysis for the current Ruby release 2.6.5:

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell.html

That version-independent URL should redirect always to the last report (if available), so currently to

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.6.5.tar.gz/codespell.html

Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable.

Just for information there are also two supplemental pages

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_conf.html

showing some used "codespell" configurations and

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_fps.html

showing all resulting obvious "false positives".

Since a lot of spelling errors seem recently been fixed a similar check was done also for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc1

 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc1.tar.gz/codespell.html
  
Jens



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>