Re: move source to github?
Ryan Davis <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:01:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:46 , Roger Pack wrote: > The easiness I was referring to was being able to work on your own > branch until your branch is ready for a pull request back to the main > repository. Compared to checking out, working, and sending in a patch? no... it really isn't easier. At best, it is equivalent. At worst, it is a lot of extra mentarbation for no tangible benefit. Git got popular in the last year or so thanks in part to github... Last I checked, there was a TON of open (and otherwise) source development being done for the 20+ years before that without it and we got along just fine. In my case, I got along better in part because git is a really sucky tool and because there was less software/tool/ process dogma/zealotry by a measurable amount.