Re: move source to github?
mathew <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:37:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 14:18, Tim Harper <[email protected]> wrote: > git has it's interface warts. =A0But sucky? =A0Relative to what? =A0Git h= as been a > fantastic tool (over subversion / CVS / Microsoft Sourcesafe) You might want to try using, well, basically any other distributed VCS (e.g. Monotone, Mercurial or Bazaar). You'll discover that Git has a horrible and confusing UI compared to almost all the others (*), and that the others can do all the really useful stuff that Git does. See also http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2007/12/08/limbo-why-users-are-more-error-pro= ne-with-git-than-other-vcses/ http://www.netsplit.com/2009/02/17/git-sucks/ Sure, Git might be better than SVN, CVS and SourceSafe. That's like saying that Perl is better than shell script. mathew [ (*) Arch is the exception. ] --=20 <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>