Re: Ruby Docs with annotations and searching
"Conor Hunt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I had one idea to help with picking out good comments. Include a vote up / vote down mechanism for comments. Then it is easier to pick out comments that hit a certain threshold (either up or down) for inclusion or exclusion. -- Conor On 5/17/06, Conor Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you make it *too* easy to add a comment, you probably are > > needlessly setting yourself up for a lot of de-spamming work. (It's > > possible that the php and mysql folks do quite a bit of housekeeping > > that we don't know about -- dunno.) > > Ok, yes I agree, especially as the site gets larger. Initially thoughI > would argue that the barrier to commenting should be low to get > momentum going. > > I really do like the way the PHP docs work, I don't know what they do > in the background, but I have found incredible use from the comments, > usually the comments are more useful than the official documentation! > I have heard many times "why doesn't Ruby or Rails have documentation > like PHP?" > > -- > Conor >