Re: Ruby Docs with annotations and searching

"Conor Hunt" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.ruby.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I had one idea to help with picking out good comments. Include a vote
up / vote down mechanism for comments. Then it is easier to pick out
comments that hit a certain threshold (either up or down) for
inclusion or exclusion.

--
Conor

On 5/17/06, Conor Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you make it *too* easy to add a comment, you probably are
> > needlessly setting yourself up for a lot of de-spamming work. (It's
> > possible that the php and mysql folks do quite a bit of housekeeping
> > that we don't know about -- dunno.)
>
> Ok, yes I agree, especially as the site gets larger. Initially thoughI
> would argue that the barrier to commenting should be low to get
> momentum going.
>
> I really do like the way the PHP docs work, I don't know what they do
> in the background, but I have found incredible use from the comments,
> usually the comments are more useful than the official documentation!
> I have heard many times "why doesn't Ruby or Rails have documentation
> like PHP?"
>
> --
> Conor
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.