Re: Ruby3 Will Have Types
Gerald Bauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAxEZd95HWi-ZcPxCP4cbXozPKvH_MdR4njG=vXF1AoTyDmqUg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello,
The twitter posting is a follow-up from the Ruby Kaigi with Matz.
And yes, the headline should be rewritten to "Ruby 3 will have
(optional) type interfaces / annotations" - the key word being
optional (and in a separate "interface" .rbi file if you do not want
annotation in your script itself).
Here's the referenced video from Matz's talk ->
https://youtu.be/cmOt9HhszCI?t=2148
If anyone has other sources more news, please tell.
Cheers.
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>