Re: Ruby for Infosec
"Carlo E. Prelz" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:35:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Subject: Ruby for Infosec Date: gio 27 giu 19 08:03:57 +0530 Quoting Surya Poojary ([email protected]): > I know python is the preferred language for Infosec . But since python and > ruby are similar ,why is ruby not used often in Infosec? If you are looking for a one-word answer: politics. Those who take decisions often have limited technical knowledge. It exposes them to less potential risks to 'do what the others do'. Google has pushed Python at the right time and places. Not because Python was better than any other language; because the creator of Python was working with them at the time. In my opinion, it is difficult to be very proficient in both Ruby and Python. It is like when you have to speak two similar languages (say: Spanish and Portuguese). You are prone to mixing them up and you end up making lots of errors. Only, with human listeners willing to make a bit of extra effort, meanings get through. Computer language interpreters are picky, on the other hand. They do not try to understand, they just complain: Syntax error! With the tendency in the market to see programmers as commodities, it is now easier for employers to find mediocre Python programmers to substitute one's own when they break. This all boils down to a world that is more and more dependent on code, and this code is very often written (in Python or in any other language) by mediocre programmers. You can see the consequences with your own eyes. The status quo is VERY fragile. Carlo -- * Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte, * K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected] che bisogno ci sarebbe * di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu) Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>