Re: Ruby for Infosec
john pfersich <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:55:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 /*—————————————————-*/ Sent from my iPhone https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/51616339056/sig.png See https://objectnets.net and https://objectnets.org > On Jun 27, 2019, at 07:52, Surya Poojary <[email protected]> wrote: > > So well said ! I prefer ruby to python , though. > >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, 10:12 Carlo E. Prelz, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Subject: Ruby for Infosec >> Date: gio 27 giu 19 08:03:57 +0530 >> >> Quoting Surya Poojary ([email protected]): >> >> > I know python is the preferred language for Infosec . But since python and >> > ruby are similar ,why is ruby not used often in Infosec? >> >> If you are looking for a one-word answer: >> >> politics. >> >> Those who take decisions often have limited technical knowledge. It >> exposes them to less potential risks to 'do what the others do'. >> >> Google has pushed Python at the right time and places. Not because >> Python was better than any other language; because the creator of >> Python was working with them at the time. >> >> In my opinion, it is difficult to be very proficient in both Ruby and >> Python. It is like when you have to speak two similar languages (say: >> Spanish and Portuguese). You are prone to mixing them up and you end >> up making lots of errors. Only, with human listeners willing to make a >> bit of extra effort, meanings get through. Computer language >> interpreters are picky, on the other hand. They do not try to >> understand, they just complain: Syntax error! >> >> With the tendency in the market to see programmers as commodities, it >> is now easier for employers to find mediocre Python programmers to >> substitute one's own when they break. >> >> This all boils down to a world that is more and more dependent on >> code, and this code is very often written (in Python or in any other >> language) by mediocre programmers. >> >> You can see the consequences with your own eyes. The status quo is >> VERY fragile. >> >> Carlo >> >> -- >> * Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte, >> * K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected] che bisogno ci sarebbe >> * di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu) >> >> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk> > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>