Re: Ruby for Infosec

john pfersich <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:55:19 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
+1

/*—————————————————-*/
Sent from my iPhone
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/51616339056/sig.png
See https://objectnets.net and https://objectnets.org

> On Jun 27, 2019, at 07:52, Surya Poojary <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> So well said ! I prefer ruby to python , though.
> 
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, 10:12 Carlo E. Prelz, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>         Subject: Ruby for Infosec
>>         Date: gio 27 giu 19 08:03:57 +0530
>> 
>> Quoting Surya Poojary ([email protected]):
>> 
>> >    I know python is the preferred language for Infosec . But since python and
>> >    ruby are similar ,why is ruby not used often in Infosec?
>> 
>> If you are looking for a one-word answer:
>> 
>> politics.
>> 
>> Those who take decisions often have limited technical knowledge. It
>> exposes them to less potential risks to 'do what the others do'.
>> 
>> Google has pushed Python at the right time and places. Not because
>> Python was better than any other language; because the creator of
>> Python was working with them at the time.
>> 
>> In my opinion, it is difficult to be very proficient in both Ruby and
>> Python. It is like when you have to speak two similar languages (say:
>> Spanish and Portuguese). You are prone to mixing them up and you end
>> up making lots of errors. Only, with human listeners willing to make a
>> bit of extra effort, meanings get through. Computer language
>> interpreters are picky, on the other hand. They do not try to
>> understand, they just complain: Syntax error!
>> 
>> With the tendency in the market to see programmers as commodities, it
>> is now easier for employers to find mediocre Python programmers to
>> substitute one's own when they break.
>> 
>> This all boils down to a world that is more and more dependent on
>> code, and this code is very often written (in Python or in any other
>> language) by mediocre programmers.
>> 
>> You can see the consequences with your own eyes. The status quo is
>> VERY fragile. 
>> 
>> Carlo
>> 
>> -- 
>>   *         Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte,
>> * K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected]             che bisogno ci sarebbe
>>   *               di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu)
>> 
>> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>
> 
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>


Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>