Re: Ruby on Jets

I don’t understand your question, then. Compare them for what? Is your goal to deploy [something] on Jets, or to solve a particular business or technical problem with a Web app, or what? If you take a step back and explain your goal(s) one or another of us may be able to help you. 

Walter

> On Jul 16, 2019, at 5:30 PM, Jason Long <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> I guess that I must compare Rails with Sinatra?
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> 
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 6:03 PM, Walter Lee Davis
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rails is a large framework, built for long-running tasks. It takes (sometimes many) seconds to load and initialize everything. Jets is a "serverless" methodology way to get Ruby into a Lambda (function as a service) world. The idea of these is that you have a single, simple function (validate this credit card, say) and you implement it in a single function that returns an answer in milliseconds. There's a fundamental mis-match between these two goals. Nothing wrong with Rails or the "serverless" idea. They each have different purposes and best uses. Rails is for monolithic applications, serverless is for single-function composable modules of code.
> 
> Walter
> 
> > On Jul 15, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Jason Long <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > Can "Ruby on Jets" offer "Ruby on Rails" features? Can it a competitor for RoR framework?
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> 
> > 
> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> > <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk
> >


Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>