RE: Simple Sinatra app speed based failure?
Andy Jones <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:24:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Perhaps I'm being thick, but I don't see where you are setting @person in a route at all? Sorry, juggling 6 things at work right now, or I would have a deeper look. -----Original Message----- From: ruby-talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leam Hall Sent: 18 July 2019 12:30 To: Ruby users Subject: Re: Simple Sinatra app speed based failure? Also, the Sinatra console error. The first log was from the command line.: https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools/blob/master/logs/speed_error_sinatra_console.txt Thanks! Leam On 7/18/19 7:27 AM, Leam Hall wrote: > Chris, I'm the only one making requests, and that is via the command > line and the up arrow. It would have to be pretty non-performant for that. > > Here's an error listing: > > https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools/blob/master/logs/speed_full_error.txt > > > I appreciate any insight you can provide! > > Leam > > > On 7/18/19 7:18 AM, Chris Roerig wrote: >> What error code is returned? Is this with only a single request to >> that endpoint or is the app potentially being overwhelmed with inbound >> requests? >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:10 AM Leam Hall <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I have a simple Sinatra based app: >> https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools >> >> That calls some defaults if data is not provided: >> >> https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools/blob/master/lib/ftl_tools/crewgen.rb#L60-L64 >> >> >> This morning I noticed that one set of basic tests would randomly >> (one, >> both, neither) fail: >> >> https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools/blob/master/spec/unit/crewgen_spec.rb >> >> >> At first I thought my RSpec-fu was weak, but using curl to test gave >> interesting results: >> >> https://github.com/makhidkarun/ftl_tools/blob/master/logs/speed_errors.txt >> >> >> In the speed_errors.txt log, the end column is "Current Speed". When >> the >> speed is between 49K and 70K, the form returns what it's supposed to. >> However, when the speed is in excess of 300K, the form does not >> return >> properly, and the spec will either show a data failure, or a return >> code >> failure. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Leam >> >> >> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe> >> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk> >> >> >> >> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk> >> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk> Click here to view Company Information and Confidentiality Notice.<http://www.jameshall.co.uk/index.php/small-print/email-disclaimer> Please note that we have updated our privacy policy in line with new data protection regulations. Please refer to our website to view the ways in which we handle your data. Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>