Re: Final iteration lost?

On 8/8/19 3:59 PM, John W Higgins wrote:

>      > The better option here is to create a "job" and have it process
>     the rows as opposed to processing rows and then creating a job

Leam replied:

>     John, just a quick reply on this. I'm still very much a Ruby beginner,
>     your solution took me a couple reads to begin to understand. I think
>     it's brilliant, and will work to understand it more.


On 8/11/19 9:53 AM, Robert Klemme then wrote:
> I would add one caveat: John's approach adds knowledge about the 
> formatting to class Job. 

To which Leam replies:

Understood. My biggest hurdle was to get the object to accumulate all 
the sub-sections without losing the last one, and preferably without 
additional post-processing. There are a variable number of sub-sections, 
and that was my trouble-spot.

The regex parsing before, and the presentation after, should not be a 
part of the Job class.

Thanks!

Leam

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>