Re: Is ruby a good choice for infosec?
"Carlo E. Prelz" <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Dec 2019 06:42:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ruby.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Subject: Is ruby a good choice for infosec? Date: ven 06 dic 19 07:50:44 +0530 Sorry for the delay! > The internet is full of python for infosec, is ruby a good choice too ? I > know metasploit and Ronin are built in ruby but python has more security > focused packages like paramiko.. > What's your take? My take is the take of one who is not working in infosec, nor would he, since information security is an impossible goal to reach, and those who promise security know, or should know, that they are delivering hopes rather than certainties. Nevertheless, I can intuit that anybody who would really manage to gain insights and obtain practical results from his work in this mined field would need to become *very* intimate with the tools he uses. The best is if he can develop them himself, but even if some pre-made packages are used, certainly the sheer number of available packages is not an advantage per se: why have twenty-five types of wrench available, all with different handles and different build quality, if the wrench you end up using is always the same one? Ruby *as a language* (that is, not because of the libraries it provides) offers great advantages of expressivity in the code you write. The good programmer finds this of great value. Carlo -- * Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte, * K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected] che bisogno ci sarebbe * di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu) Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk>