Re: separate compilation
Thomas Wicklund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.sather.announce |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jason R. McVetta writes: > I don't see why the compile time static type checking system should > prevent separate compilation, either. A pre-compiled binary > representation of a class would only need provide the class's name and > it's type signatures; those things would alone satisfy type-checking. Separate compilation was a victim of insufficient resources from what I've gleaned in the many years I've followed Sather. If I remember correctly there are also some technical reasons why it's difficult, but couldn't say what they are. _______________________________________________ Info-sather mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-sather