Re: Improving IDE support for scala GSOC 2105

+1 .... according to KISS.
Am 18.03.2015 06:00 schrieb "Naftoli Gugenheim" <[email protected]>:

> That would be really nice. But it would be good to start with more basic
> things (have they implemented yet the ability to change parentheses to
> curly braces and vice versa?).
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, 4:14 AM Muhammad Mohsin Khan Niazi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am thinking to improve IDE support for Scala by pointing out
>> improvements (inside code editor) that can help in writing better code. The
>> main idea is inspired by what Resharper does for C# or IntelliJ/Netbeans
>> does for Java 8. Take a simple example where anonymous method can be
>> replaced by lambda expression Idea IDE will point out that this method can
>> written in more concise way.
>>
>>
>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-v-RbbYBWlTs/VQfhJO6P8kI/AAAAAAAAAUs/6CDbSihSQj4/s1600/Screenshot%2Bfrom%2B2015-03-17%2B12%3A34%3A40.png>
>> Similarly resharper points out many instances where single line LINQ can
>> replace many lines of traditional code.
>>
>>
>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-teAUiw_w0uM/VQfhh6rtFwI/AAAAAAAAAU0/ZwIsW8LckRY/s1600/index_codeanalysis.png>
>>
>> (image source: www.jetbrains.com <https://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/>)
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=resharper+9&safe=active&client=ubuntu&hs=mYo&channel=fs&biw=1252&bih=589&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSpwEJCkzce8Klxu0akgELELCMpwgaiAEKOggCEhSjCNkJmwjCCc4JpxC_1CMQPnQirHBogZIa3dZ0IwLBpFTovbfQ9uf5XHsjiUsAe8HCAA5nSnzwKSggDEhTCDNMBwwzSAdcBuQzPHcEM-wvqBxowghvXE_1d82Y0IDv6MqDzZ0slmfCd4RgfdgbES6eRAQkBCEGD9wHKcXBhGxJkBPgJSDCE0Cu0KpGmvbA>
>>
>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-teAUiw_w0uM/VQfhh6rtFwI/AAAAAAAAAU0/ZwIsW8LckRY/s1600/index_codeanalysis.png>
>> Similarly for Scala we can replace a pattern matching solution: (Example
>> from
>> http://reactive.xploregroup.be/blog/9/Scala-tips:-Improving-the-imperfect-part-1
>> )
>>
>> val result: Option[String] = person.contactDetails match {
>>   case Some(details) => details.address match {
>>     case Some(address) => address.street match {
>>       case Some(street) => Some(street.capitalize)
>>       case _ => None
>>     }
>>     case _ => None
>>   }
>>   case _ => None
>> }
>>
>> with the flat map solution to get more concise code:
>>
>> val result = person.contactDetails.flatMap { details =>
>>   details.address.flatMap { address =>
>>     address.street.map { street =>
>>       street.capitalize
>>     }
>>   }
>> }
>>
>>
>> But this is just the start we can have a look at other IDEs and think of our own ideas to
>> improve the IDE support for Scala including bug fixes. So what do you guys think of this idea?
>> Is it suitable for GSOC?
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "scala-language" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scala-language" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.