Re: Factors that prevent implicit conversions to be found
Johannes Rudolph <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.scala |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKF7Hnf_2rgtwsxwXf-n7LNT57BW8SgNNc99WD=h47wpYJ-GAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks again Martin, the missing result types were exactly the problem. I guess this also explains the sometimes observed non-deterministic cases where the order of compilation units during incremental were another factor that would allow the compilation to succeed in a few cases. Johannes On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Johannes Rudolph <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:27 PM, martin odersky <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could it be a case of an implicit with a missing result type? > > Ah, yes, that could be. It's a path-dependent result type, so it > wasn't spelled out. I'll see what happens if it is spelled out. > > Thanks, > > -- > Johannes > > ----------------------------------------------- > Johannes Rudolph > http://virtual-void.net -- Johannes ----------------------------------------------- Johannes Rudolph http://virtual-void.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.