Re: Re: Shouldn't collection zip functions return streams?
Rex Kerr <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:41:42 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.scala |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP_xLa0t4wjn=v6+1B5DMUyyqRxyXF=0nnyR1_vQ2YnzhDWpyQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Actually I was using it to mean precisely "not evaluating everything eagerly". The clarity of the border is really important, though: I completely agree there. A clear but awkward border isn't so great, though, as that encourages people to avoid border-crossings when they really make sense. --Rex On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Simon Ochsenreither < [email protected]> wrote: > Not evaluating everything eagerly doesn't necessarily mean laziness in the > sense you are using it here. > > What I think we need is a clearly defined boundary between _no_ evaluation > and evaluation, just like many other libraries out there. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scala-language" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.