Re: Re: Shouldn't collection zip functions return streams?

Rex Kerr <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:41:42 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.scala
Message-ID <CAP_xLa0t4wjn=v6+1B5DMUyyqRxyXF=0nnyR1_vQ2YnzhDWpyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Actually I was using it to mean precisely "not evaluating everything
eagerly".

The clarity of the border is really important, though: I completely agree
there.  A clear but awkward border isn't so great, though, as that
encourages people to avoid border-crossings when they really make sense.

  --Rex


On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Simon Ochsenreither <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Not evaluating everything eagerly doesn't necessarily mean laziness in the
> sense you are using it here.
>
> What I think we need is a clearly defined boundary between _no_ evaluation
> and evaluation, just like many other libraries out there.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scala-language" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.