Re: Re: VerifyError ascribing java annotations to scala.annotation.Annotation
Lukas Rytz <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:27:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.scala |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABV726Coew4nBLd+N7hQ_dVzstS1FjyB8Nae+7NABmfm5VsLiQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Feel free to create a ticket; make sure to link to the other related issues and discussions. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Daniel Armak <[email protected]> wrote: > It's mentioned in a comment on SI-9400, but not in the title or > description, and it's unrelated to subclassing a Java annotation, so the > ticket is hard to find. I'd create a new, more prominent ticket, but I > don't know what your policy is. > > Thanks, > > Daniel Armak > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Lukas Rytz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is another incarnation of >> https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9400 >> see also the discussion on https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/4638. >> >> >> On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 8:10:41 PM UTC+1, Daniel Armak wrote: >>> >>> Even weirder: >>> >>> scala> val x: Deprecated = null >>> x: Deprecated = null >>> >>> scala> x: StaticAnnotation >>> res14: scala.annotation.StaticAnnotation = null >>> >>> scala> (x: StaticAnnotation): Annotation >>> res15: scala.annotation.Annotation = null >>> >>> scala> x: Annotation >>> java.lang.VerifyError: Bad type on operand stack >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Armak >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Armak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> scala> import scala.reflect.runtime.universe.typeOf >>>> scala> import scala.annotation.Annotation >>>> scala> import java.lang.Deprecated >>>> >>>> scala> typeOf[Deprecated] <:< typeOf[Annotation] >>>> res0: Boolean = true >>>> >>>> scala> val x: Deprecated = null >>>> x: Deprecated = null >>>> >>>> scala> x: Annotation >>>> java.lang.VerifyError: Bad type on operand stack >>>> >>>> The same happens with any Java annotation, Deprecated isn’t special. >>>> >>>> What is the intention? Why should Java annotations subtype >>>> scala.annotation.Annotation? >>>> >>>> This is mentioned in a comment in SI-9400, but that’s about a different >>>> issue and I think if this is a bug it deserves its own ticket. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Armak >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "scala-language" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "scala-language" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scala-language/4Cjr_n3CAr0/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.