Modules
David Starner <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:55:02 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.scala |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMZ=zj6kLyi+eJFvDG4azc==WVMrD94v1uZEnViKJ-YKmETE0g@mail.gmail.com> |
--001a113ccf464bea550541531dd0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Java 9 is feature complete, and the module system (Jigsaw) is designed and documented. (O'Reilly has "Java 9 Modularity" in Early Release and in Safari, and http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ has most of the necessary information.) Is there any plans on Scala adopting a compatible module system? It looks like there could be a reasonably straightforward adaptation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a113ccf464bea550541531dd0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Java 9 is feature complete, and the module system (Jigsaw)= is designed and documented. (O'Reilly has "Java 9 Modularity"= ; in Early Release and in Safari, and <a href=3D"http://openjdk.java.net/pr= ojects/jigsaw/">http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/</a> has most of th= e necessary information.)=C2=A0 Is there any plans on Scala adopting a comp= atible module system? It looks like there could be a reasonably straightfor= ward adaptation.<br></div> <p></p> -- <br /> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;scala-language" group.<br /> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">scal= [email protected]</a>.<br /> For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br /> --001a113ccf464bea550541531dd0--