Re: Case class companion objects extending FunctionN in line with SLS?

Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Dec 2016 05:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.scala
Message-ID <[email protected]>
------=_Part_1467_957950680.1482325474088
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1468_6600335.1482325474088"

------=_Part_1468_6600335.1482325474088
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> See also https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-3664, 
https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5570

Ah, thanks for the links, Adriaan! Going through the discussion threads, 
I'm not quite clear how to summarize the "something else" that you refer to 
;-) There are a couple of comments that categorize this as spec omissions, 
and others that point to this being deliberately not in the spec, and 
rather an "implementation side-effect" that one presumably shouldn't rely 
on.

Could you confirm if either of those two is the correct interpretation?

Thanks!

ap

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_1468_6600335.1482325474088
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">&gt; See also=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://issues.scala-lang.or=
g/browse/SI-3664" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"nofollow">https://issues.scala-l=
ang.org/<wbr>browse/SI-3664</a>,=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://issues.scala-lang.=
org/browse/SI-5570" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"nofollow">https://<wbr>issues.=
scala-lang.org/browse/<wbr>SI-5570</a><div><br></div><div>Ah, thanks for th=
e links, Adriaan! Going through the discussion threads, I&#39;m not quite c=
lear how to summarize the &quot;something else&quot; that you refer to ;-) =
There are a couple of comments that categorize this as spec omissions, and =
others that point to this being deliberately not in the spec, and rather an=
 &quot;implementation side-effect&quot; that one presumably shouldn&#39;t r=
ely on.</div><div><br></div><div>Could you confirm if either of those two i=
s the correct interpretation?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><b=
r></div><div>ap</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;scala-language&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">scal=
[email protected]</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_1468_6600335.1482325474088--

------=_Part_1467_957950680.1482325474088--