Re: [PATCH] doc: fix typo in tutorial.texi

Alex Jordan <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:51:36 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.gnu.general
Message-ID	<20170411005136.GO15897@Alexs-MacBook-Pro>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 08:41:09PM -0400, Alex Jordan wrote:

> I'm attaching a patch that fixes a typo I found while going through
> the tutorial. The problem was "passed arguments ments" instead of
> "passed arguments" but when I did M-q in Emacs to wrap lines, it
> reformatted the whole paragraph. Hence the larger diff. I'm not sure
> if it's formatted correctly (see waaaay below), so feel free to mangle
> my patch and commit it, ignore my patch and just commit the fix
> yourselves, etc.

Aaaand I forgot to send the actual patch. It should be attached now.

AJ

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

0001-doc-fix-typo-in-tutorial.texi.patch (text/plain, 1.2 KB)

From 883ef5ce3630af76c00ab7edcb1cec1ac191eb48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Jordan <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:42:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix typo in tutorial.texi

---
 doc/tutorial.texi | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/tutorial.texi b/doc/tutorial.texi
index f1122175..e5132220 100644
--- a/doc/tutorial.texi
+++ b/doc/tutorial.texi
@@ -279,11 +279,11 @@ which then prints out:
    99
 @end example
 
-These examples show how to manipulate an array.  They also
-show the standard way in which messages are passed arguments
-ments.  In most cases, if a message takes an argument, its
-name will end with `:'.@footnote{Alert readers will remember that the math
-examples of the previous chapter deviated from this.}
+These examples show how to manipulate an array.  They also show the
+standard way in which messages are passed arguments.  In most cases,
+if a message takes an argument, its name will end with
+`:'.@footnote{Alert readers will remember that the math examples of
+the previous chapter deviated from this.}
 
 So when we said @code{x at: 1} we were sending a message to whatever
 object was currently bound to @code{x} with an argument of 1.  For an
-- 
2.12.2

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 963 B)