Re: configure option not to build gst-browser ?

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.gnu.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I tested the configure option '--enable-gtk=no',
but this is not exactly doing what I had hoped.

The gst-blox and gst-browser are still created as links to gst-load.

I guess that modifying the Makefile.in to not add those to GST_EXTRA_TOOLS,
is a workaround or solution:

Changing
GST_EXTRA_TOOLS = gst-reload gst-sunit gst-blox gst-package gst-convert \
        gst-doc gst-remote gst-profile gst-browser

to
GST_EXTRA_TOOLS = gst-reload gst-sunit gst-package gst-convert \
        gst-doc gst-remote gst-profile

But I didn't test this, it may create new problems.

Also it's not very nice to modify the Makefile.in.

Basically on systems without GTK-2 GNU Smalltalk can still be very useful,
with its emacs interface and CLI tools, so the GTK-2 additions are nice,
but in my opinion not critical, those components can be "optional" I suppose.

David Stes

----- Op 17 jan 2021 om 17:41 schreef stes [email protected]:

> Is there for GNU Smalltalk an option to the "configure" script,
> not to build gst-browser (a.k.a) VisualGST ?
> 
> I don't immediately see this option ... perhaps --without-package=GTK ?
> or fixing the Makefile.in to remove gst-browser ??
> 
> The way the Makefile.in works it seems it ALWAYS sets gst-browser links
> for GST_EXTRA_TOOLS.
> 
> If there would be an option not to build gst-browser,
> that would help perhaps to release GNU smalltalk 3.2.6,
> so that at least the traditional CLI and emacs support of GNU smalltalk,
> could be release in a new package "3.2.6"  (or 3.3 or whatever number is
> choosen).
> 
> David Stes
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.