Re: Harvesting infrastrucure

Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 2) the CVS at sourceforge only allows ssh for developers, and pserver
>    is blocked by many firewalls. I'd like to set up a cron-job
>    to checkout the sources each night, and then build a .zip from
>    it.
Ideally we would find a way to make use of the compilefarm at SF to
build a full set of sources every now and then. VMMaker is fully
scriptable and I think we can succesfully pass scripts to the image
these days so it ought to be feasible.

tim
--
Tim Rowledge, [email protected], http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Design simplicity: It was developed on a shoe-string budget.
From [email protected] Fri Jun 06 17:47:18 2003
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 16403 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 17:47:18 -0000
Received: from mailhub02.unibe.ch (130.92.9.53)
  by mail.theinternetone.net with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 17:47:18 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhub02.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A576467
	for <[email protected]>;
	Fri,  6 Jun 2003 19:47:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhub02.unibe.ch ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mailhub02 [127.0.0.1:10024]) (amavisd-new) with LMTP
 id 09318-01-24 for <[email protected]>;
 Fri,  6 Jun 2003 19:47:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4])
	by mailhub02.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341AE7643C
	for <[email protected]>;
	Fri,  6 Jun 2003 19:47:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from iam.unibe.ch (asterix [130.92.64.4])
	by asterix.unibe.ch (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h56HlEK14180
	for <[email protected]>;
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:47:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:47:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Deprecation problems?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
From: Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]>
To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
	<[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
	<[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
 <squeakfoundation.lists.squeakfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeakfoundation>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 17:47:18 -0000

Hi michael


On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 08:31 AM, Michael Rueger wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> first I must apologize that I'm totally and hopelessly behind in 
> reading the mails on the lists. I couldn't find answers to the 
> following questions, so please be kind if I just overlooked them.
>
> And I'm sending this to the foundation list because I think this is a 
> harvesting issue...
>
> Why are a lot of the (browser, Undeclared references) query messages 
> broken by the introduction of SystemNavigation (I'm using image 3.6a 
> update 5247)? And why are there 9 implementors of #systemNavigation 
> all over the system? (I guess that is what the class extension 
> discussion was about, I read that much)
The idea is that by having systemNavigation is class like stringHolder 
all the subclass avoid to duplicate SystemNavigation new and still be 
able to override it. Now I do not want to put
systemNavigation in Object (sure we could use a class extension) but 
for the moment I'm waiting to have a better package management (even if 
avi will do the right remark that monticello is working and DVS as 
well). So if ***you*** reviewers, guides tell us we are really stupid 
and we should have used DVS I will say why not but for the moment we do 
not have a decomposition of the system in terms of packages.

> And the deprecated call should allow you to proceed with the 
> deprecated version until it is fixed and not just cut you off.

We know we fixed that as soon as we realized that it was stupid. The 
PROBLEM is that
not all the changesets (where this is fixed) have been harvested. I 
said it, said it
and said it again but there is nothing I can do except apologize to 
have been stupid at first.

By the way michael cleaning the system is not that fun and I ask 
regurlarly for design idea
because I do not think that I have all the answers (the past proved 
it). Now just
participate, read the propositions, browse the changesets, ....help us 
to push this out of the door.

Stef



> Boy, we went down this road with modules, didn't we?
>
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
>