RE: KCP & 3.6

Do the "somewhat larger" issues mean problems as soon as we insert the
DecPools, or changes when we convert the image? if the second, does this
mean it makes sense to insert the code, but convert the rest of the
image in 3.7, or do you think this would be confusing?

Daniel

Andreas Raab <[email protected]> wrote:
> Doug,
> 
> > If the DecPools stuff feels like it's "ready", we could put 
> > it in now, otherwise we can put it in right at the beginning of
> > 3.7alpha, which isn't too far away anyway.  (It sounds like there
> > are still some outstanding issues at the moment...?) 
> 
> There are some issues but which fall into two categories: minor problems
> (like defining instance side methods) which can be considered "beta
> problems" and (somewhat larger) problems making the entire system use
> declarative pools. The latter doesn't sound like a problem of the
> declarative pools but rather their application in certain dubious
> circumstances (the use of TextStyles in TextConstants, or the use of
> lower-case globals is not an issue with declarative pools).
> 
> > I originally wanted to get the TrueTypeTextStyle stuff in as 
> > well, but there may or may not be time for that. 
> 
> What's upholding this? Anything I can help with?
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
From [email protected] Fri Jun 20 19:09:07 2003
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 3584 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2003 19:09:07 -0000
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (HELO pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca)
	(24.71.223.10)
	by mail.theinternetone.net with SMTP; 20 Jun 2003 19:09:07 -0000
Received: from pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr3so-ser.prod.shaw.ca
	[10.0.141.179])2003)) with ESMTP id <0HGS00L9MNV2G4@l-daemon> for
	[email protected]; Fri,
	20 Jun 2003 13:09:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca
 (pn2ml1so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.145]) by l-daemon
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id <0HGS00F86NV2MF@l-daemon> for
 [email protected]; Fri,
 20 Jun 2003 13:09:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from h24-77-112-143.vc.shawcable.net
 (h24-77-112-143.vc.shawcable.net [24.77.112.143])
 by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id <0HGS0034GNV15N@l-daemon> for
 [email protected]; Fri,
 20 Jun 2003 13:09:02 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Avi Bryant <[email protected]>
Subject: scrollbar look enh (was Re: [Squeakfoundation]KCP & 3.6)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
 <[email protected]>
Message-id: <[email protected]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
	<[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
 <squeakfoundation.lists.squeakfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeakfoundation>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:09:08 -0000


On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Stephane Ducasse wrote:

> > 8. Avi said he doesn't like something about the scrollbars. These
> > don't have a preference, which Diego said he'd treat as a bug. I don't
> > know of review/testing status.
>
> If one guy say something why should we stop.

Oh, don't stop it from getting in just on my account.  Like Diego, I do
consider that missing preference to be a bug, but probably a bug it'll
take him all of 30 seconds to fix.  Fix it, approve it, move on.  Diego?

Avi