Re: ContextCleanupPlus-ajh (was: Re: KCP & 3.6)

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:40:49PM -0400, PhiHo Hoang wrote:
> > Has anyone contacted the SmaCC authors and asked?  Maybe we can get
> > Alan to ask; it would be tough for a Smalltalker to say no ;-)
> 
> > > PS. People may find it tempting to simply drop the "golden rule" sofar
> > > that everything in official Squeak should be under Squeak-L. That would
> > > probably (as Andrew Greenberg has pointed out multiple times) lead to a
> > > legal minefield and be very bad for Squeak.
> >
> > Looking at the SCO situation, we would be very stupid to do something
> > like this.
> >
> 
>     OTOH, I felt sickened at the heart when Alan had to appeal to
>     Squeakers to share the fruits of their research.

I don't remember this.  What was the context?  If it's not much trouble,
could you point me at the relevant email?

Also, I don't quite see the connection to my SCO comment; perhaps it
is in response to saying no to Alan?

Best,
Joshua

> 
>     Cheers,
> 
>     PhiHo.
>