Re: Shepherding large enhancements
<[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:28:04 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[WARNING: The virus "shouting to show I'm right" infected some emails] >>>> I'm against having a release on Friday. >>>> >>>> Just look at the BugfixArchive: There's a lot of stuff pending, >>>> which really needs to be included. And my feeling is, that there's >>>> just not enough "new" stuff in 3.6 to allow a new release: Like >>>> 3.5, we'd get a "new release" nobody would use. >>> >>> Agree as I mention in one of my early emails. >>> 3.6 should be sexy in terms of new stuff/clean/improvements. >>> Let us make it really sexy. >> >> Hmmm. And then people - WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY THIS WHEN THE 3.6 PLAN WAS >> POSTED??? > > Ahh, that is so right. And also - > SO WHY DO YOU WAKE UP NOW, INSTEAD OF WAKING UP A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO > WHEN WE FIRST SAID WHAT WASN'T GOING TO BE READY, AND START REVIEWING > LIKE THERE'S NO TOMMORROW??? Am I suscribed to the same list than you? I'm reading email like the stef's one for weeks! > Ok, got that out of my system, phew. Sorry ;-) The next time try a key labeled [BACKSPACE] after shouting instead of a simple "sorry" that doesn't help. Try it! I used several times! > BTW, I'm glad to see more people doing the BFAV thing, and advancing > the process, but this doesn't clash with making a release in any way > whatsoever. People can go on coding and reviewing and advancing Squeak > right through beta and gamma - harvesters will simply have a slightly > bigger pile when we enter 3.7 alpha. The point is so simple: - Some of us don't share the direction that squeak-guides choose. That is, in fact, no direction at all. - Some of us simply don't want to acept that squeak is becoming the "next php/python/ruby/linux" instead of the environment where the ideas and concepts can be tried and evolved for the next 20 years. - Before trying a fork we decided to wait for the promises of tha new process. (It's include the SM11 configuration maps) - We're wasting our limited time in bureaucracy instead of just creating new stuff. - The process is showing it's not enough to fullfit the needs of everybody. Did you awake now? > Daniel Diego