Re: Shepherding large enhancements

Hi goran

but the plan 3.6 is perfect for me. We just have to stick with it.
Sexy for me means having a

	- clean kernel
	- diego stuff,
	- closure,
	- netwrok rewrite
	- simulator ....


So 3.6 is PERFECT but 3.5,5 is not so that is why I said that I would 
prefer that 3.6
should not come in beta just now.

Stef



On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 10:21 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>> I'm against having a release on Friday.
>>>
>>> Just look at the BugfixArchive: There's a lot of stuff pending, which
>>> really needs to be included. And my feeling is, that there's just
>>> not enough "new" stuff in 3.6 to allow a new release: Like 3.5, we'd
>>> get a "new release" nobody would use.
>>
>> Agree as I mention in one of my early emails.
>> 3.6 should be sexy in terms of new stuff/clean/improvements.
>> Let us make it really sexy.
>
> Hmmm. And then people - WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY THIS WHEN THE 3.6 PLAN WAS
> POSTED???
>
> He, I couldn't help myself, sorry for the shouting. ;-) But I really
> mean it. We agreed on the plan. And one of the things we wanted to do 
> is
> to have faster release cycles than before - we are aiming for 3 
> releases
> per year IIRC.
>
> There will ALWAYS be stuff to harvest. There will ALWAYS be cool new
> stuff to add. But we need a proper beta and gamma period.
>
> Personally I think we should stick to the plan but move the beta start 
> a
> few days so that NewLook, TTF and Simulatorfixes can get in.
>
> IMHO SM1.1 can wait until early 3.7. Even if it breaks my heart to 
> admit
> it. :-)
>
> regards, Göran
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
>