Re: Fwd: Packages in both the image and SqueakMap ofPackageInfo))
Marcus Denker <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:37:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:29:22PM -0400, Doug Way wrote: > >There's that bug that you need to create the "sm" directory > >by hand. (if not, walkback). This needs to be fixed soon. > >I think Ned posted a fix... > > > > > > I see Ned has posted a few SM (and SMLoader) related fixes. These are > tricky... we probably don't want to have these fixed in the image but > not fixed in the corresponding package on SM. The package on SM should > always be the "master" copy, with the image updated occasionally from > that, otherwise things will get pretty confusing. > > Daniel may have already incorporated the SMLoader-related fixes into his > latest versions, I haven't kept track. But there is no recent version > of SM 1.0x, so we know that any recent SM fixes (such as Ned's > create-the-"sm"-directory fix) are not in any recent version. > > If these fixes are important enough for 3.6, perhaps Goran could put out > a simple SqueakMap 1.07 which includes them. (or maybe it would be > SqueakMapBase) Or if he's extra-busy with SM 1.1 or other things right > now, someone else with the SM password could do it... > IMHO there can't be any release without fixing that bug I mentioned above: You get a walkback as soon as you try to open the Packageloader. Marcus -- Marcus Denker [email protected] -- Squeak! http://squeak.de