Re: Fwd: Packages in both the image and SqueakMap ofPackageInfo))

I agree the sm directory is not nice.

By the way Alex started to implement a splitter: takes a changeset and 
produces several changesets based on removal information.
This may interest you. We used it to split some KCP 3.5 changesets.

Stef

On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:29:22PM -0400, Doug Way wrote:
>>> There's that bug that you need to create the "sm" directory
>>> by hand. (if not, walkback). This needs to be fixed soon.
>>> I think Ned posted a fix...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I see Ned has posted a few SM (and SMLoader) related fixes.  These are
>> tricky... we probably don't want to have these fixed in the image but
>> not fixed in the corresponding package on SM.  The package on SM 
>> should
>> always be the "master" copy, with the image updated occasionally from
>> that, otherwise things will get pretty confusing.
>>
>> Daniel may have already incorporated the SMLoader-related fixes into 
>> his
>> latest versions, I haven't kept track.  But there is no recent version
>> of SM 1.0x, so we know that any recent SM fixes (such as Ned's
>> create-the-"sm"-directory fix) are not in any recent version.
>>
>> If these fixes are important enough for 3.6, perhaps Goran could put 
>> out
>> a simple SqueakMap 1.07 which includes them. (or maybe it would be
>> SqueakMapBase)  Or if he's extra-busy with SM 1.1 or other things 
>> right
>> now, someone else with the SM password could do it...
>>
> IMHO there can't be any release without fixing that bug I mentioned
> above: You get a walkback as soon as you try to open the Packageloader.
>
>    Marcus
>
>
>
> -- 
> Marcus Denker [email protected]  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
>