Re: Fwd: Packages in both the image and SqueakMap ofPackageInfo))

I've looked at all pending fixes I could find to SM, and have released a
new version with a couple of fixes by Ned.

The relevant fix to solve this is by SFA (called "[FIX]
SM-createSMDir-asm"), and should be applied to SM itself. I don't have
the sm password for SM. I've tested the fix, and it works.

Daniel

Doug Way <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marcus Denker wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:13:44AM -0400, Doug Way wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>FYI, if no one objects, I will update the SM packages that are in the 
> >>image, by adding the latest versions to the update stream.  Only the 
> >>SMPackageLoader and PackageInfo have newer versions on SM, so these are 
> >>the only two that will get updated.  The version on SM is still the 
> >>"master", as described below.  (Seems relatively safe, since there 
> >>haven't been big changes to either of these and they've been publicly 
> >>available for awhile.)  This will be the last update of this sort for 
> >>3.6.
> >>    
> >>
> >There's that bug that you need to create the "sm" directory
> >by hand. (if not, walkback). This needs to be fixed soon.
> >I think Ned posted a fix...
> >  
> >
> 
> I see Ned has posted a few SM (and SMLoader) related fixes.  These are 
> tricky... we probably don't want to have these fixed in the image but 
> not fixed in the corresponding package on SM.  The package on SM should 
> always be the "master" copy, with the image updated occasionally from 
> that, otherwise things will get pretty confusing.
> 
> Daniel may have already incorporated the SMLoader-related fixes into his 
> latest versions, I haven't kept track.  But there is no recent version 
> of SM 1.0x, so we know that any recent SM fixes (such as Ned's 
> create-the-"sm"-directory fix) are not in any recent version.
> 
> If these fixes are important enough for 3.6, perhaps Goran could put out 
> a simple SqueakMap 1.07 which includes them. (or maybe it would be 
> SqueakMapBase)  Or if he's extra-busy with SM 1.1 or other things right 
> now, someone else with the SM password could do it...
> 
> - Doug
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation