Re: LogEngine / Re: Ideas for 3.7

On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 11:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> [about LogEngine]
> Yes, I agree that this should be in the "Basic" Squeak. It still should
> be a package though.
I can mantian it along with my other suffs at http://cat.sf.net.

>
> And while we are on that subject (or something):
> Should I create categories "Minimal", "Basic" and "Full" and put them
> under... some nice top category?
> And are there other categories we would like to have?
I think a minimal image  will be a nice thing, but only if it will not 
require so-much effort.
The "Minimal" image will retain  all the programming stuff (like 
Interpreter, Compiler and so on)?
For example, one would install a minimal seaside (or wiki) server 
without the need of manually remove the other programs (like sound and 
midi support and so on)...


bye bye
-- 
    [   [  [ JJ ]  ]   ]  | Wondering whether a machine can think is
                          | like asking if a submarine can swim.
http://www.siforge.org   |  -- From someone's .sig