LogEngine / Re: Ideas for 3.7

[Minimal Basic, Full categories]
Sounds good to me, except that we don't currently have any Minimal
packages, and I'm not quite clear on what they'd mean. However, tagging
the Basic and Full packages seems useful (simpler "load Full" script).

I'd like to say this would also give us a trivial "strip down to basic"
script, but there currently is no uniform way for packages to unload
themselves...

Daniel

[email protected] wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Giovanni Giorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >   I'd like to do a very small request.
> > I have done a very small Log Engine
> > You can see it at
> > < http://sourceforge.net/projects/cat/ >
> > < http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/cat/LogEngine1.0.st.gz >
> > 
> > I'd like to put it in the next Squeak Base image, because I think it 
> > can be a very useful tool for
> > developers.
> [SNIP]
> 
> Yes, I agree that this should be in the "Basic" Squeak. It still should
> be a package though.
> 
> And while we are on that subject (or something):
> Should I create categories "Minimal", "Basic" and "Full" and put them
> under... some nice top category?
> 
> And are there other categories we would like to have?
> 
> regards, Göran
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation