Re: Allow MIT-licensed code to be partof"SqueakOfficial"?

On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 02:21 AM, [email protected] 
wrote:

> Doug Way <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There seems to be agreement that allowing the MIT license into "Squeak
>> Official" (Full/Basic) is reasonable.  (And also possibly BSD, but we
>> might as well put that off until it is needed.
> [SNIP of stuff I totally agree on]
>
> Yes, all sounds good.

Alright, I'll incorporate SmaCC-Runtime in the next round of updates 
then.  It will be handled as an "in-image" package for now, so we can 
keep track of the MIT-licensed code... the master copy of SmaCC will be 
on SqueakMap, and I'll just include the package as an update.

Hm, I notice the SmaCC Runtime package on SqueakMap says "Other 
License" at the moment, that should be changed to "MIT".  Markus G., 
could you update this?  Hm, also the package itself is a SAR at the 
moment (containing only one .st file)... it would be better if it were 
a .st or .cs file instead, so I don't have to keep converting from .sar 
by hand every time I incorporate a new version as a changeset update.  
(Not that that will probably happen very often, but...)

- Doug