Re: SmaCC-Development (was: Allow MIT-licensed code to be partof"SqueakOfficial"?)

hi anthony

SmaCC-Development will be on squeakmac so everybody will be able to 
change it.

Stef


On Dimanche, nov 23, 2003, at 19:32 Europe/Zurich, Anthony Hannan wrote:

> I hope your planning on including SmaCC-Development and not just
> SmaCC-Runtime.  It wouldn't be Squeak if we could not change the Parser
> within itself.
>
> Cheers,
> Tony
>
> Doug Way <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 02:21 AM, [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Doug Way <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> There seems to be agreement that allowing the MIT license into 
>>>> "Squeak
>>>> Official" (Full/Basic) is reasonable.  (And also possibly BSD, but 
>>>> we
>>>> might as well put that off until it is needed.
>>> [SNIP of stuff I totally agree on]
>>>
>>> Yes, all sounds good.
>>
>> Alright, I'll incorporate SmaCC-Runtime in the next round of updates
>> then.  It will be handled as an "in-image" package for now, so we can
>> keep track of the MIT-licensed code... the master copy of SmaCC will 
>> be
>> on SqueakMap, and I'll just include the package as an update.
>>
>> Hm, I notice the SmaCC Runtime package on SqueakMap says "Other
>> License" at the moment, that should be changed to "MIT".  Markus G.,
>> could you update this?  Hm, also the package itself is a SAR at the
>> moment (containing only one .st file)... it would be better if it were
>> a .st or .cs file instead, so I don't have to keep converting from 
>> .sar
>> by hand every time I incorporate a new version as a changeset update.
>> (Not that that will probably happen very often, but...)
>>
>> - Doug
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Squeakfoundation mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
>