Guides frozen at 6!
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, since noone is touching this potato I will do it: When we first formed the Guides we said that 3-4 is a nice figure. Then we grew a bit from that (Craig, Daniel) so we are now 6. Then I wrote that 6 is probably enough - hey, we will rotate etc and you don't need to be a Guide to do stuff. Then I started sketching out roles since I believe that it is VITAL that we have some form of structure in our work and the absolute MINIMAL is to at least have ROLES that we are aware of. When doing that Ned added a few roles I had missed and then I realized we couldn't fill all these roles. So I thought that hey, perhaps we can just pick up one or two more Guides and fill them. I also wrote to that effect. But giving it more thought I think that we should stay at 6 and instead make it absolutely clear that you don't need to be a Guide to do these kind of things. Scott Wallace will hopefully still keep the update stream in order (I hope) for a while at least (together with Doug). Bruce will still keep churning out those downloads of Squeak and Cees will hopefully still want to take responsibility of the external relations aspect. This is important - let's keep the Guides group at the size of 6 so that it can communicate without too much overhead. And instead of being tempted to grow that group - let's put down all these other roles we alread have in the community. We alread have Cees in charge of SqF (more or less), Russel Allen and Ted Kaehler are already in charge of the www.squeak.org website etc. And then in 6 months or something - we rotate - so everybody will get a "chance" of burning away some otherwise perfectly free time that you can spend with friends and family. :-) I also apologize to Cees for "messing it up" like this. ;-) So, Tim, Daniel, Ned, Craig, Doug - let me hear your voices. regards, Göran