Re: Guide roles! PLEASE!

[email protected] (Cees de Groot) wrote:
>  <[email protected]> said:
> >Just change the roles! :-) I am aware they overlap but couldn't come up
> >with anything better. But best is if you formulate "your own" roles. I
> >was just improvising a bit. And if you want to combine those three into
> >one role and simply sign up all three there then fine by me. As long as
> >we know who is doing what! That is the only thing I want.
> >
> I think you shouldn't get too hooked up on these roles lest the become
> leading. The important thing is that there a Guides and that they are
> instrumental in setting the agenda for the community (based on some intricate
> social process with lots of feedback loops yaddayadda). Whatever needs to be
> done, defines the Roles. I hope there'll be a Guide of Croquet Integration in
> six months, when the 'Detanglement' role will be something of the past. 
> 
> It's fluid, go with the flow (did you tell you about the River of Roal that
> flows through the Blue and Plink Plains of Squeakland, which changes its route
> with every rain season?)
> 
> (IM(NS)HO, YMMV, AFAIK, ...)

:-) Lots of "suspenders on" here!

Anyway, yes, I agree. I just wanted to have some little, little
structure about who is doing what. That's all. And I have been bitching
about it enough so if the other Guides don't see the need for this then
so be it - perhaps it is not needed.

Note: I hate bureaucracy. So this is the *only* structure I ask for
becuase I really like personal responsibility.

regards, Göran