Re: One more update for 3.2.1?

The SMLoader change is now done an on SM, but I now tend to agree with
sentiments expressed that a 3.2.1 with SM is not that important,
considering the direction of 3.4a and all.

Daniel

Doug Way <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Scott, there was some discussion earlier about adding the SqueakMap bootstrap update to 3.2.1, similar to what was added to 3.4alpha.  I think we should do this, since easy access to SqueakMap was the main point of the 3.2.1 release, I believe.  (Would you be able to just re-use update #5105?)
> 
> However, the one thing we should probably wait for is Daniel's update to the SMLoader package, so that the 3.2-compatible packages will show up in the list.  (See below.  Almost done with that, Daniel? (nudge) :-) )  Once this is done, perhaps you could go ahead and add the update to 3.2.1.
> 
> - Doug
> 
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > > :-) Yes, we need to fix the Package Loader to "treat" 3.2.1 as 3.2 when
> > > filtering for versions. Or something to the same effect. Perhaps just
> > > use "beginsWith:" instead of "="? :-) And some other things.
> > 
> > So basically, we'll have SM categories for image versions like 3.2, 3.3,
> > 3.4, and they will match actual image versions like 3.2.1, 3.3a, 3.4a
> > and so forth?
> > 
> > Ok, it'll go into the next version.
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation