re: Flow integration

Hi Avi--

> It sounds like you're saying "because if I change the names, it
> forces people to make sure their stuff works with Flow".

	That's not what I'm saying, nor what I think the reality is.

> Personally, I'd love to use it, but it's not gonna happen (or not anytime
> soon) if it means porting all my existing code to it.

	It doesn't. As I've said, it means temporarily using a few different
class names.

> On the other hand, if Flow can live happily side by side with the
> current streams, and I can, *without* any porting effort, have new
> code that uses Flow in the same image as old code that doesn't...

	That is the case. :)

> ...I'm likely to actually use Flow - and it's only by getting used
> that Flow will get tested at all.

	Yup.


	thanks,

-C

--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
[email protected]
www.netjam.org/resume
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]