re: Flow integration

Craig Latta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Göran--
> 
> > Or am I missing something?
> 
> 	Well, having done refactorings of this magnitude several times before,
> and having tried "both ways", I think that what I suggest would take a
> lot less time and energy, yielding better quality.

Ok, I have too many things in the air right now, but IIRC you
essentially want Flow to enter the base image as a big "refactoring",
right?

Why is that better than letting it be a package that people can depend
on if they like?

Some reasonable people may consider Flow to be much more than a
"refactoring".

regards, Göran