Re: Ad-hoc final harvesting for 3.4
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree. Fixing the existing events system is a reasonable goal for 3.4, a new one might be for 3.5. Daniel Ned Konz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 08 December 2002 11:35 am, Andreas Raab wrote: > > The problem is that #click is really a trigger for a method > > (script) in the window which may happen asynchronously. And this > > script is clearly owned by the window and not by the button and > > that's what all of these event frameworks never take into account. > > With the model that I built this is different (and not only in this > > respect ;-) Here, the subscriber always remembers its registrations > > (messages) *strongly* and the publisher always remembers the > > subscriptions *weakly* (by default). > > This sounds like a good scheme. Perhaps in 3.5? > > -- > Ned Konz > http://bike-nomad.com > GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE > > _______________________________________________ > Squeakfoundation mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation