Re: Ad-hoc final harvesting for 3.4
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, then that's my position too - consider adding Torge's selection code into 3.5a, after some more inspection. About ParensBlinking, I wonder - why shouldn't it stay a package? Daniel Avi Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Daniel Vainsencher wrote: > > > Avi, it's not clear whether you've looked at Torge's code, or just want > > the functionality. If not, could you have a look and let us know what > > you think? > > Daniel, > > I didn't have time to thoroughly audit the code. It does look reasonable > and well factored, and it comes with SUnit tests, so I generally trust it. > However, it does touch an awful lot of code (7 classes and lots of > methods), and given that I would recommend bringing it in for 3.5 rather > than 3.4. > > Avi > > > _______________________________________________ > Squeakfoundation mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation