RE: defineClass fix!
Ian Piumarta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 [email protected] wrote: > "Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The bug was introduced by Torge's 5137 fix. > > > > What was the fix?! If I revert that change then everything seems to be > > all right. It doesn't have any effect I can see... > > It appeared to be a check so that one can't enter methods when the > method category "all" is selected. But I never verified that Torge's > check worked... I just assumed it did. > > Aha, ok - the idea is that it gives you a proper "inform" instad of > "Nothing more expected ->" if you start entering a method without first > selecting a method category. If I understood it correctly. Didn't this used to (way back yonder) create a new protocol (or add to an existing protocol) called "as yet unclassified" for methods entered while "--all--" is selected? What happened to that? (Or did I simply dream that this was the case, in some kind of "perverse hacker nightmare"?) Ian