The Inbox: MethodMassage-dtl.73.mcz
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David T. Lewis uploaded a new version of MethodMassage to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/MethodMassage-dtl.73.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: MethodMassage-dtl.73 Author: dtl Time: 23 May 2026, 6:24:40.21969 pm UUID: 3148219f-bb82-4666-9fd7-5c6d6e727ef1 Ancestors: MethodMassage-dtl.72 Make BytecodeCoverageTests>>expectedFailures do the right thing for EncoderForV3PlusClosures The #expectedFailures for BytecodeCoverageTests appears first in MethodMassage-eem.58 but was mistakenly implemented on the class side and later moved to instance side in MethodMassage-ct.69, which now results in an expected failure for #testCoverageOfTestBasicBlockLabelsForMethod for the test running with EncoderForSistaV1, and a not expected failure for EncoderForV3PlusClosures. The test fails with either encoder, so just mark it as an expected failure. =============== Diff against MethodMassage-dtl.72 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: BytecodeCoverageTests>>expectedFailures (in category 'failures') ----- expectedFailures "Alas this class's single test only passes if there are methods in the MethodMassage package that are compiled without full blocks." + - self thisPackage actualMethodsDo: - [:m| - m isQuick ifFalse: - [m encoderClass supportsFullBlocks ifFalse: - [^#()]]]. ^#(testCoverageOfTestBasicBlockLabelsForMethod)! Squeak-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]