Re: AI-generated contributions

Stéphane Rollandin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I think the resentment against LLMs is not just a dogmatic aversion of 
> the community against hearing about new tools. Instead, as you can see, 
> LLMs are quite likely to hallucinate at this point in time, especially 
> about niche topics such as Squeak/Smalltalk. Would it be too much to ask 
> to at least try out all AI-generated code snippets yourself before 
> sharing them in public?

+1

> One should only post such content if one can stand behind it and take 
> responsibility for it under one's own name. To me it's highly 
> understandable if people don't want to review AI slop contributions that 
> do not meet this criterion. There's more important work to be done than 
> fixing the errors of a stochastic parrot that will not learn from your 
> corrections. That's a crucial difference from reviewing human 
> contributions, which have the important side effect of training other 
> people on the system and the intentions behind it, as well as bonding 
> with other human beings in the community.

+1

 >[...]
+1 +1 +1...

Thanks for this beautiful, and deeply meaningful, post.

Stef
Squeak-dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.