Re: AI-generated contributions
Stéphane Rollandin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I think the resentment against LLMs is not just a dogmatic aversion of > the community against hearing about new tools. Instead, as you can see, > LLMs are quite likely to hallucinate at this point in time, especially > about niche topics such as Squeak/Smalltalk. Would it be too much to ask > to at least try out all AI-generated code snippets yourself before > sharing them in public? +1 > One should only post such content if one can stand behind it and take > responsibility for it under one's own name. To me it's highly > understandable if people don't want to review AI slop contributions that > do not meet this criterion. There's more important work to be done than > fixing the errors of a stochastic parrot that will not learn from your > corrections. That's a crucial difference from reviewing human > contributions, which have the important side effect of training other > people on the system and the intentions behind it, as well as bonding > with other human beings in the community. +1 >[...] +1 +1 +1... Thanks for this beautiful, and deeply meaningful, post. Stef Squeak-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]