Re: [squeak-smalltalk/squeak-object-memory] Senders of `textDomain` finds all methods that send `translated` (Issue #156)
Christoph Thiede via Squeak-dev <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:06:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <squeak-smalltalk/squeak-object-memory/issues/156/[email protected]> |
LinqLover left a comment (squeak-smalltalk/squeak-object-memory#156) > **We could ignore AdditionalMethodState** ... but then we would also ignore a method's selector? > > allLiteralsDo: aBlock scanForSpecial: aBoolean > "Overwritten to skip certain (raw) literals." > > "Exclude method selector (or properties) and the method's class. Include code literals." > 1 to: self numLiterals - 2 do: [:index | > (self literalAt: index) allLiteralsDo: aBlock scanForSpecial: aBoolean]. > > "Enumerate the implicit literals in bytecodes of the receiver." > aBoolean ifTrue: [self implicitLiteralsDo: aBlock]. > > "Enumerate method selector only through additional method state." > self penultimateLiteral isMethodProperties > ifTrue: [self penultimateLiteral allLiteralsDo: aBlock scanForSpecial: aBoolean] Maybe `#allLiteralsDo:scanForSpecial:` is too generic for senders search? For `SystemNavigation>>allCallsOn:`, disabling the additional method state enumeration seems to work still well. But users probably expect pragmas to be enumerated through this interface, too. But for other users of `#allLiterals` et al., the additional method state might be relevant ... -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-object-memory/issues/156#issuecomment-4682533352 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <squeak-smalltalk/squeak-object-memory/issues/156/[email protected]> Squeak-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]